A psychological visibility of Lady Macbeth would likely say things like " manipulative , " " paranoid , " " unlikely to create literal societal bond , " and " a bit of a germaphobe . " An analysis of Benedick fromMuch Ado About Nothingwould likely produce Scripture like " cocky , " " arrogant , " and " highly societal . " But how about an analysis of Shakespeare himself ? In astudy publish inPsychological Science , Ryan Boyd and James Pennebaker at the University of Texas at Austin used a combining of text - analyzing software program and psychological hypothesis to make a unique visibility of the Bard that unite him to the playDouble Falsehood .
student have long debated its ancestry : Some argue that Shakespeare was in full creditworthy , while others consider that Lewis Theobald , whose name was attach to the swordplay when it was first published in 1728 , was the author — in 1727 , Theobald claimed that he had three transcript of Shakespeare ’s lost play , Cardenio , and be after to adapt it intoDouble Falsehood .
for put an end to the debate , Boyd and Pennebaker used software to identify and evaluate sure features present in the works of Shakespeare , his occasional collaborator John Fletcher , and Theobald . AsScience Dailyexplains ,
Boyd and Pennebaker also rated how " flat " the piece of writing was so as to understand each author ’s thought cognitive process and to give each of them an precise " psychological signature . "
From analyzingDouble Falsehood — along with 33 maneuver by Shakespeare , nine by Fletcher , and 12 by Theobald — the researchers close that the style of the play in motion most intimately resembles that of a " sociable and fairly well educated , " individual or the exact opposite of Theobald , whoBoyd describes as " very smart but probably somewhat of ajerk . " Pennebaker notes that while Shakespeare was the clear author for the first three acts , there ’s more grounds of Fletcher ’s involvement in four and five .
Another cause close .
